|
A
Matter of Compatibilty
A story by Bryan Harrison
Based on character concepts
established in the film
AI: Artificial Intelligence
Transcript
of excerpt from audio-recording obtained from anonymous persons, allegedly
recorded during tests conducted at Cyberchild Industries. Voices are
one unidentified female (1) and one unidentified male (2), assumed to
be employees of Cyberchild. Names are omitted, perhaps censored by the
creator of the recording or the person who sent the disk.
(Sound of door slamming, indistinguishable
peripheral noises.)
(1) - What the hell happened?
(2)- If we knew that we wouldnt
be in this mess, would we?
(1) - Well, isnt this your department?
(2)- Dont even try it! Ive
never even seen the neural map for this thing. (unintelligible) was
all just plug it in and let it go, right? Now, Im
supposed to come in and clean up the mess? Why dont you call Hobby?
Its his design, right?
(1)- Last warning.
(2)- OK, fine! Play your games. But
you cant sit on this forever.
(1)- Let me worry about that. Have
you ever seen a malfunction like this?
(2)- It
wasnt a malfunction. There was some kind of conflict in the system.
(1) What
kind of conflict?
(2)- It was a matter of compatibility.
Listen, (unintelligible) Im not taking the fall for this one.
Not alone. Youd better think about that
(1) - Maybe You need a vacation. Youre
getting jumpy.
2
Automated Rejection Response from Litigation
Net-Clerk to Legal Council for plaintiff Julia Contreras-Zimmerman on
the matter of pending Complaint against Cyberchild Industries:
In response to e-filing on matter of Zimmerman vs. Cyberchild Re: Motion
toInclude Peripheral Testimony/Evidence; Testimony of Monica Swinton
(plaintiff in un-related case), Testimony of Tom Rhoze (Cybertronics
technician in un-related case), audio-recording of Cyberchild employees
at Mecha-child trials:
This document has been returned un-filed, pending judgment on the following
proceedings:
(a) Matter of Swinton vs. Cybertronics; Relevance of Simulant Unit behavior
to emotional anguish of plaintiff derived from malfunction of Simulant
Unit due to characteristics not
disclosed in arbitration
contract; Legality of non-disclosure in respect to contract.
(b) Matter of Cybertronics vs. Cyberchild; Re: Commercial Espionage,
Intellectual Theft, and Copyright Infringement.
Plaintiff Julia C. Zimmermans request for inclusion of the testimony
of Monica Swinton and/or Tom Rhoze cannot be filed without prior judgment
on at least one of the preceding matters.
Clerks Note: Peripheral Testimony must fall under existing legal standards
of relevance before it can be considered evidentiary. Without precedence
established on matter legality of Cybertronics failure to disclose relevant
data in arbitration contract and/or Cyberchild alleged intellectual
theft of programming design, no case for testimony can be considered
applicable to proceedings. Either finding will establish relevance in
your case and the motion can then go before the Judge.
If you would like notification of Judgment on these cases, please fill
out form CN-1624-a and mark Relevance on the Reason
for Notification tab.
In regards to the Cyberchild audio recording, please separate Motion
for Inclusion as Evidence Re: audio-recording, from packet and resubmit
separately. This matter can proceed before the Judge.
For further inquiries or complaints please contact a Civil Matters Supervisor
@ Shadow Creek Net-Home.gov
3
Melancholy
always descended on Julia this time of year. It wrapped her tightly
in its brooding grey cloak, and left her bedridden for a month before
it finally, mercifully passed. Medford, her husband of fifteen years,
had grown used to this annual hibernation and had long since learned
to make the best of his early retirement during that time by scouring
the sunken towns along the coast with his recreational salvage team,
zipping through the skies in his time-share Strato-cruiser, or catching
a round of Zero-G golf with the small circle of friends his work allowed.
He was also prone to spend this time with
another woman. An Orga woman.
Not that such a delineation would have made
much difference to Julia, had she been aware of her husbands infidelities,
which she was not. It was not that she was a stupid, or naive woman.
It was because the Medford Zimmerman shed married had not been
a man capable of detailed or prolonged deceptions. It didnt seem
to be in his nature. So, after an initial period of watchful newlywed
skepticism, shed come to trust her husband. Implicitly.
Six years after that his affair had begun.
Julias annual depression had first started
the year before her husband break of faith, in the spring of their fifth
year. This was the year that Medford had worked his way up from the
ranks of corporate anonymity to become a face often seen, if not yet
known, in the halls of aspiring power, where gathered the upwardly mobile
acolytes who had already shed their now useless ethical skins and cut
their teeth on stabbing each other in the back. Whoever survived these
savage training grounds would then begin the slow ascent up the corporate
ladder to the green pastures of wealth, privilege and security. The
once quiet and bookish Medford Zimmerman, the one with whom a young
Julia Contreras had fallen in love and married, would become one of
the survivors, so much so that he would retire from the work place long
before any of his peers. He would also become a different man in the
process.
So, in the spring of that fifth year, when
the fruits of her husbands labor and ethical sacrifices began
to sprout, Julia had applied to the Child Licensing Authority for a
permit to make their family the perfect triad that only the most fit
to parenthood were allowed.
She had been promptly denied.
How can they! shed screamed
that night, as her (at that point) faithful husband had rocked her in
his arms. She had been clasping the document that carried the official
decision. It was already torn and wrinkled from being thrown into, and
retrieved from, the trash basket three times by that point.
The infamous psychological temperament tests
that were one of many obstacles for applicants to the CLA, were not
always accurate. The institution had been sued in the past when couples
they had deemed unstable, had thrived for years, well past the point
when age would allow them a license. The CLA had insisted that the couples
had managed their longevity simply out of spite and that had they been
allowed to bring a life into the world, it would have wound up being
another for the already overburdened Fed to feed. This argument had
not always proved effective, or even valid.
But the tests had been quite accurate on the
matter of the marriage of Contreras/Zimmerman, and had inadvertently
given Julia the first of many hints that she would fail to notice.
Please, Julia, Medford had pleaded,
Well apply again. We only have a 12-month waiting period.
But that following year he would meet Miriam Jefferson at a time-share
pitch for his latest hobby, strato-cruising, and their affair would
begin during an innocent dinner that same evening.
Julia had been at home the night her husband
embarked on his departure from his matrimonial agreements. Shed
been pacing their large suburban home, crying; throwing away and retrieving
the second of what would wind up a total of six denials by the CLA.
The tests had once again picked up on Medfords potential for infidelity.
Contrasted with Julias strong conservative profile, the prognosis
had suggested a likelihood of divorce and custody battles and the inevitable
emotional trauma to any child. Their application was, once again, denied.
It was basically a matter of compatibility.
Julia had only been able to tolerate four
more of those notices before the sham of applying was dispensed of and
she, instead, would take to the bed with remote in hand and hibernate
until the chill of her emotional season had passed.
Then, in the third
year of her annual hibernation, a small, unknown
company named Cyberchild contacted the troubled Zimmerman family, and
everything changed.
|